| Book of Mormon | Annotations | 
 
  | Chapter 2
 
 |   | 
 
  | 1 And now, Jacob, I speak unto you: Thou art my firstborn
  in the days of my tribulation in the wilderness. And behold, in thy childhood
  thou hast suffered afflictions and much sorrow, because of the rudeness of
  thy brethren. |   | 
 
  | 2 Nevertheless, Jacob, my firstborn in the wilderness,
  thou knowest the greatness of God; and he shall consecrate thine afflictions
  for thy gain. |   | 
 
  | 3 Wherefore, thy soul shall be blessed, and thou shalt
  dwell safely with thy brother, Nephi; and thy days shall be spent in the
  service of thy God. Wherefore, I know that thou art redeemed, because of the
  righteousness of thy Redeemer; for thou hast beheld that in the fulness of
  time he cometh to bring salvation unto men. |   | 
 
  | 4 And thou hast beheld in thy youth his glory; wherefore,
  thou art blessed even as they unto whom he shall minister in the flesh; for
  the Spirit is the same, yesterday, today, and forever. And the way is
  prepared from the fall of man, and salvation is free. |   | 
 
  | 5 And men are instructed sufficiently that they know good
  from evil. And the law is given unto men. And by the law no flesh is
  justified; or, by the law men are cut off. Yea, by the temporal law they were
  cut off; and also, by the spiritual law they perish from that which is good,
  and become miserable forever. | 2 Ne 2:5-25
 Here’s my summary of what I think these verses say.
 
      God has a purpose (that men might have joy, 2 Ne 2:25).Without opposition, nothing has purpose, because a thing without its opposition is as nothing (2 Ne 2:11-13)God gave the law (though it cuts men off per 2 Ne 2:5) because the law inflicts punishment which punishment is in opposition of happiness or joy (2 Ne 2:10).This happiness is inseparable from the atonement (2 Ne 2:10).God gave unto man to act for himself which is made possible by being enticed by things in opposition—forbidden fruit vs. tree of life (2 Ne 2:15-16).Acting for oneself seems to be necessary in order for the law to inflict punishment or for the atonement to endow happiness. In short I think this is to justify the need for the atonement. I think the
  presentation lacks clarity, but that could be expected if a person were
  writing by engraving metal plates or if Joseph were just dictating, without
  notes, an account he created to a scribe.
 Secondarily the need for opposition in all things could be seen as an
  explanation for the problem of evil (2 Ne 2:17-19). In justifying the problem
  of evil, I think it would fall short. It doesn’t overcome the problem that
  Satan himself committed horrific evil (enough to become perdition) in the
  pre-mortal existence even without being tempted by some outside force like a
  devil. It also doesn’t overcome the fact that the scriptures tell us God
  intercedes in many cases to overcome evil, but fails to intercede in other instances
  of evil.
 
 Also, Satan could have thwarted God’s purpose in all of this at any time by
  just refusing to play. If Satan did not participate, there would be no
  opposition in all things.
 | 
 
  | 6 Wherefore, redemption cometh in and through the Holy
  Messiah; for he is full of grace and truth. | Annotation for 2 Ne 2:5-25 above | 
 
  | 7 Behold, he offereth himself a sacrifice for sin,
  to answer the ends of the law, unto all those who have a broken heart and a
  contrite spirit; and unto none else can the ends of the law be answered. | Annotation for 2 Ne 2:5-25 above
 Also, doesn’t it seem similar to an ancient tribal religion in which God
  requires a human sacrifice?
 | 
 
  | 8 Wherefore, how great the importance to make these things
  known unto the inhabitants of the earth, that they may know that there is no
  flesh that can dwell in the presence of God, save it be through the merits,
  and mercy, and grace of the Holy Messiah, who layeth down his life according
  to the flesh, and taketh it again by the power of the Spirit, that he may
  bring to pass the resurrection of the dead, being the first that should rise. | Annotation for 2 Ne 2:5-25 above | 
 
  | 9 Wherefore, he is the firstfruits unto God, inasmuch as
  he shall make intercession for all the children of men; and they that believe
  in him shall be saved. | Annotation for 2 Ne 2:5-25 above | 
 
  | 10 And because of the intercession for all, all men come
  unto God; wherefore, they stand in the presence of him, to be judged of him
  according to the truth and holiness which is in him. Wherefore, the ends of
  the law which the Holy One hath given, unto the inflicting of the punishment
  which is affixed, which punishment that is affixed is in opposition to that
  of the happiness which is affixed, to answer the ends of the atonement— | Annotation for 2 Ne 2:5-25 above | 
 
  | 11 For it must needs be, that there is an opposition in
  all things. If not so, my firstborn in the wilderness, righteousness could
  not be brought to pass, neither wickedness, neither holiness nor misery,
  neither good nor bad. Wherefore, all things must needs be a compound in one;
  wherefore, if it should be one body it must needs remain as dead, having no
  life neither death, nor corruption nor incorruption, happiness nor misery,
  neither sense nor insensibility. | Annotation for 2 Ne 2:5-25 above | 
 
  | 12 Wherefore, it must needs have been created for a thing
  of naught; wherefore there would have been no purpose in the end of its
  creation. Wherefore, this thing must needs destroy the wisdom of God and his
  eternal purposes, and also the power, and the mercy, and the justice of God. | Annotation for 2 Ne 2:5-25 above | 
 
  | 13 And if ye shall say there is no law, ye shall also say
  there is no sin. If ye shall say there is no sin, ye shall also say there is
  no righteousness. And if there be no righteousness there be no happiness. And
  if there be no righteousness nor happiness there be no punishment nor misery.
  And if these things are not there is no God. And if there is no God we are
  not, neither the earth; for there could have been no creation of things,
  neither to act nor to be acted upon; wherefore, all things must have vanished
  away. | Annotation for 2 Ne 2:5-25 above | 
 
  | 14 And now, my sons, I speak unto you these things for
  your profit and learning; for there is a God, and he hath created all things,
  both the heavens and the earth, and all things that in them are, both things
  to act and things to be acted upon. | Annotation for 2 Ne 2:5-25 above | 
 
  | 15 And to bring about his eternal purposes in the end of
  man, after he had created our first parents, and the beasts of the field and
  the fowls of the air, and in fine, all things which are created, it must
  needs be that there was an opposition; even the forbidden fruit in opposition
  to the tree of life; the one being sweet and the other bitter. | Annotation for 2 Ne 2:5-25 above | 
 
  | 16 Wherefore, the Lord God gave unto man that he should
  act for himself. Wherefore, man could not act for himself save it should be
  that he was enticed by the one or the other. | Annotation for 2 Ne 2:5-25 above | 
 
  | 17 And I, Lehi, according to the things which I have read,
  must needs suppose that an angel of God, according to that which is written,
  had fallen from heaven; wherefore, he became a devil, having sought that
  which was evil before God. | Annotation for 2 Ne 2:5-25 above | 
 
  | 18 And because he had fallen from heaven, and had become
  miserable forever, he sought also the misery of all mankind. Wherefore, he
  said unto Eve, yea, even that old serpent, who is the devil, who is the
  father of all lies, wherefore he said: Partake of the forbidden fruit, and ye
  shall not die, but ye shall be as God, knowing good and evil. | Annotation for 2 Ne 2:5-25 above | 
 
  | 19 And after Adam and Eve had partaken of the forbidden
  fruit they were driven out of the garden of Eden, to till the earth. | Annotation for 2 Ne 2:5-25 above | 
 
  | 20 And they have brought forth children; yea, even the
  family of all the earth. | Annotation for 2 Ne 2:5-25 above | 
 
  | 21 And the days of the children of men were prolonged,
  according to the will of God, that they might repent while in the flesh;
  wherefore, their state became a state of probation, and their time was
  lengthened, according to the commandments which the Lord God gave unto the
  children of men. For he gave commandment that all men must repent; for he
  showed unto all men that they were lost, because of the transgression of
  their parents. | Annotation for 2 Ne 2:5-25 above | 
 
  | 22 And now, behold, if Adam had not transgressed he would
  not have fallen, but he would have remained in the garden of Eden. And all
  things which were created must have remained in the same state in which they
  were after they were created; and they must have remained forever, and
  had no end. | Annotation for 2 Ne 2:5-25 above
 Also, as confirmed by Apostle Bruce R. McConkie, prior to Adam’s fall, “death
  and procreation had yet to enter the world” (“Christ and the Creation”
by Elder Bruce R. McConkie).
  And President Harold B. Lee also taught that by the fall of Adam, “a change
  was wrought over the whole face of the creation, which up to that time had
  not been subject to death” (Teachings of Presidents of the Church: Harold B. Lee).
 
 Regardless of when you think humankind began, whether 6,000 or 200,000 years
  ago, is it rational to believe there was no death before humans with the
  evidence to the contrary?
 | 
 
  | 23 And they would have had no children; wherefore they
  would have remained in a state of innocence, having no joy, for they knew no
  misery; doing no good, for they knew no sin. | Annotation for 2 Ne 2:5-25 above
 Also, even as a believer this made no sense to me. Having children is somehow
  falling out of innocence? Having children can help a person progress from
  naiveté, but this verse seems to be indicating a fall from innocence that is
  more a sin or transgression. Maybe that’s just an artifact of how I
  understood this as a believer. However, if that is how it should be
  understood, how does one explain that having children is a sin or
  transgression?
   A more humorous way to look at this is that before the
  fall, Adam and Eve were in paradise, and perhaps having children is not
  compatible with paradise. | 
 
  | 24 But behold, all things have been done in the wisdom of
  him who knoweth all things. | Annotation for 2 Ne 2:5-25 above | 
 
  | 25 Adam fell that men might be; and men are, that they
  might have joy. | Annotation for 2 Ne 2:5-25 above
 Also, this is one of my favorite verses. The verse indicates that this is a
  purpose behind human existence and a part of the divine intention or implicit
  in the creation, and I don’t accept that the universe cares about us or has
  an implicit purpose at all. However, I find/make meaning in my life in the
  pursuit of joy for myself and in trying to help others have joy.
 | 
 
  | 26 And the Messiah cometh in the fulness of time, that he
  may redeem the children of men from the fall. And because that they are
  redeemed from the fall they have become free forever, knowing good from evil;
  to act for themselves and not to be acted upon, save it be by the punishment
  of the law at the great and last day, according to the commandments which God
  hath given. |   | 
 
  | 27 Wherefore, men are free according to the flesh;
  and all things are given them which are expedient unto man. And they
  are free to choose liberty and eternal life, through the great Mediator
  of all men, or to choose captivity and death, according to the
  captivity and power of the devil; for he seeketh that all men might be
  miserable like unto himself. | This tells us all men are given what they need in
  order to choose between eternal life or death, but what about the references
  in the Book of Mormon that tell us Christ’s “blood atoneth for the sins of
  those . . . who have died not knowing the will of God concerning them, or who
  have ignorantly sinned” (Mosiah 3:11 and Moroni 8:22-24)? If some are
  ignorant as these verses in Mosiah and Moroni claim, how could they choose?
  After all, “man could not act for himself save it should be that he was enticed
  by the one or the other” (2 Ne 2:16). | 
 
  | 28 And now, my sons, I would that ye should look to the
  great Mediator, and hearken unto his great commandments; and be faithful unto
  his words, and choose eternal life, according to the will of his Holy Spirit; |   | 
 
  | 29 And not choose eternal death, according to the
  will of the flesh and the evil which is therein, which giveth the spirit of
  the devil power to captivate, to bring you down to hell, that he may reign
  over you in his own kingdom. | According to D&C 19:6-12 the words “endless” and
  “eternal” do not mean without end when it comes to “endless torment” or
  “eternal damnation”. These verses in the D&C explain that these words are
  used because, “it is more express than other scriptures, that it might work upon
  the hearts of the children of men.” When people read these words in the Book
  of Mormon, how do they likely understand the words “endless” and “eternal”?
  Is this honest communication if D&C 19 reveals the actual meaning of
  these words? | 
 
  | 30 I have spoken these few words unto you all, my sons, in
  the last days of my probation; and I have chosen the good part, according to
  the words of the prophet. And I have none other object save it be the
  everlasting welfare of your souls. Amen. |   |